"I enjoyed Clerks II" is a statement which, coming from me, adds nothing whatsoever of value to anything or anyone. It means nothing when I say it, because I have so far enjoyed all of Kevin Smith's efforts* and I had no reason to believe that I'd have anything other than a very good time watching this one. I know they're not great movies but I still went to go see the guy open up his comic book store, so an endorsement from me is pointless. But what I can admit is that I was actually touched, in a strange way, by some surprising themes present in a movie that (by its TV-ad appearances) is primarily concerned with pop culture references and unspeakable sexual acts. I will be the first to admit that Clerks (the original) is certainly not a good movie, and is most assuredly overrated even by the people who would claim that it is at least just a funny movie. I won't even try very hard to defend the overstuffed, verbose dialog, as funny as it may or may not be. (I just really like big words.) But: Clerks meant something to me when I first saw it about ten years ago. So it's probably no coincidence that, as its titular characters have also aged about the same amount of time, these clerks still have something to represent for me this time around, too.
I was having trouble putting my finger on it; I've read quite a few reviews of Clerks II but this last paragraph of the one on salon.com (linking to Salon is a guaranteed annoyance) is as close as I'm likely to come:
"Clerks II" has its problems: It rambles into sentimentality, and it doesn't need to -- the movie is more affecting when the characters are just cracking jokes. But Smith, an inherent optimist, has made a movie full of crude humor that also manages to explore the enduring qualities of friendship. And "Clerks II" gets at something even more elusive: In this country, we assume that every kid has to go to college, which will help him or her get a great job and build a happy, satisfying, productive life. A life lived any other way is probably destined to be inferior. That's not just a fallacy; it's also a way of setting people up for huge disappointments. At one point even Randal, who generally doesn't seem to be bothered much by his directionless life, says that the time he's spent lounging around, working at not-very-demanding jobs, hasn't been meaningless: "It's all building toward something," he asserts, a truth "Clerks II" stands by. Smith seems to be suggesting that there are many ways to build a life, even when you're not making much of a living.
*(I haven't gotten around to "Jersey Girl" yet.)

Recent Comments